Harrison Adams vs Seita Watanabe — Lima CH Qualifying Round 1

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA2
Harrison Adams
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 June 2024
clay
JPN
Seita Watanabe
#1705ATP
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Adams H.
6-3 6-2
Watanabe S.
Adams H.
662
Watanabe S.
320

Harrison Adams defeated Seita Watanabe 6-3 6-2 in the Lima CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Adams H.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Watanabe S.

Watanabe S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Adams H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Adams H.Watanabe S.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
53%
50%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (8 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Adams H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Watanabe S.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sell K.[1]
Stater A.
6-06-4
Adams H.[2]
Vilicich B.
7-56-3
Hudd E.[11]
Justo G.[3]
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Aboian L.[4]
6-36-2
Gimenez I.[9]
Ribero F.
2-66-06-3
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Leite W.[7]
6-46-3
Q1
Stater A.
Blanch D.[8]
6-37-63
Vilicich B.
Gomez J.[12]
6-03-66-3
Sell K.[1]
Gomez E.
6-26-3
Adams H.[2]
Watanabe S.
6-36-2
Hudd E.[11]
Lobanov A.
6-46-2
Barreiros Reyes M.[10]
Hilderbrand T.
6-45-76-3
Ribero F.
Farjat T.[5]
3-66-26-3
Gimenez I.[9]
Li C.
2-66-06-1
Barreto Sanchez D.[6]
Botran Neutze R.
6-06-1
Leite W.[7]
Alvarado Berrospi A.
6-36-1