Coleman Wong vs Ethan Quinn — Tyler CH Quarter-final

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
HKG2
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Wong C.
6-2 6-2
Quinn E.
Wong C.
662
Quinn E.
220

Coleman Wong defeated Ethan Quinn 6-2 6-2 in the Tyler CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Quinn E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Quinn E.
37
Serve
37
34
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Quinn E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.4
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Quinn E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
71
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Clear edge
5
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
88
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Quinn E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1593
Surface ELO
6.5+174 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1804
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Quinn E.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
97

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Quinn E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3