Tung Lin Wu vs Filip Peliwo — Tyler CH Round of 32

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Wu T.
7-5 6-2
Peliwo F.
Wu T.
762
Peliwo F.
520

Tung Lin Wu defeated Filip Peliwo 7-5 6-2 in the Tyler CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Peliwo F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Peliwo F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Peliwo F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
0
Break points saved·Dominant
84
23
Break points won·Slight edge
6
11
Deciding sets·Even
6
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Peliwo F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.3
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Peliwo F.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3