Filip Peliwo vs Ilgiz Valiev — Tyler CH Qualifying Round 2

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Filip Peliwo
POL4
Filip Peliwo
#479ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
RUS
Ilgiz Valiev
26 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
W
Peliwo F.
6-2 5-7 6-4
Valiev I.
Peliwo F.
6562
Valiev I.
2741

Filip Peliwo defeated Ilgiz Valiev 6-2 5-7 6-4 in the Tyler CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Peliwo closed it out in three sets, 6–2 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peliwo F.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Valiev I.

Valiev I.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Serve advantage — Valiev I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Peliwo F.Valiev I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Dominant
47%
82%
Service points won·Clear edge
59%
77%
Return points won·Clear edge
39%
56%
Break points saved·Dominant
58%
0%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peliwo F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Valiev I.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[4]
Valiev I.
6-25-76-4
Quinn E.[1]
Rybakov A.[12]
2-66-27-62
Bouzige M.
Smith K.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Borg L.[3]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Ilagan A.[5]
4-66-46-3
Langmo C.[10]
Sinclair C.[6]
7-646-3
Q1
Quinn E.[1]
Neff A.
6-46-756-3
Langmo C.[10]
Kumar P.
6-36-4
Rybakov A.[12]
Nefve A.
3-66-33-0
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Urrea A.
6-36-1
Smith K.
Mukund S.[2]
6-47-5
Bouzige M.
Imai S.[11]
6-41-66-4
Borg L.[3]
Tracy J.
7-57-5
Peliwo F.[4]
Mayo K.
2-66-06-4
Valiev I.
Pecotic M.[8]
6-26-1
Ilagan A.[5]
Corwin F.
2-67-56-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Frusina A.
6-16-4
Sinclair C.[6]
Cassone M.
6-47-5