Tristan Schoolkate vs Emilio Nava — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Tristan Schoolkate
#148ATP
1549ELO
1533Grass ELO
$246kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
grass
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1560Grass ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Schoolkate T.
2-6 6-3 7-6
Nava E.
Schoolkate T.
26772
Nava E.
63631

Tristan Schoolkate defeated Emilio Nava 2-6 6-3 7-6 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Schoolkate T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Schoolkate T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Schoolkate T.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.9
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Schoolkate T.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
52
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Clear edge
0
17
Deciding sets·Even
85
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Schoolkate T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Nava E.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.9Grass Elo 1533
Surface ELO
5.1+27 Grass Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1549
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Schoolkate T.Nava E.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
100

Schoolkate T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 66 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.
Riedi L.
7-687-5
Semi-finals
Harris L.
Harris B.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Nakashima B.[6]
6-43-66-1
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.[6]
Svajda Z.
7-676-3
Harris B.
Kukushkin M.
5-77-657-64
Harris L.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-36-1
Riedi L.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
R16
Harris L.
Vukic A.[7]
6-17-68
Kukushkin M.
Jubb P.
1-66-36-2
Harris B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-64
Zhukayev B.
Duckworth J.
6-47-64
Mochizuki S.
Mcdonald M.[5]
2-66-46-2
Riedi L.
Shimabukuro S.
5-76-46-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Fonseca J.
6-26-746-0
Svajda Z.
Evans D.[2]
4-67-656-3
R32
Svajda Z.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-64
Harris B.
Shang J.[8]
6-37-68
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kukushkin M.
Fery A.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.
Nava E.
2-66-37-63
Duckworth J.
Jasika O.
3-67-636-0
Zhukayev B.
Cressy M.
6-46-3
Harris L.
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vukic A.[7]
Shapovalov D.
6-37-60
Mcdonald M.[5]
Bolt A.
7-636-0
Mochizuki S.
Atmane T.
6-746-16-4
Riedi L.
Stricker D.
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Ruusuvuori E.[3]
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Bellucci M.
6-747-57-64
Fonseca J.
Edmund K.
6-26-1
Evans D.[2]
Walton A.
6-45-77-68