Sumit Nagal vs Alexander Ritschard — Heilbronn CH Final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Sumit Nagal
IND3
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1557Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Nagal S.
6-1 6-7 6-3
Ritschard A.
Nagal S.
66562
Ritschard A.
17731

Sumit Nagal defeated Alexander Ritschard 6-1 6-7 6-3 in the Heilbronn CH final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Even
33
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
84
Break points won·Clear edge
35
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ritschard A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Clay Elo 1538
Surface ELO
5.9+20 Clay Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
8.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Ritschard A.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-16-756-3
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[3]
Van Assche L.[5]
6-27-65
Ritschard A.
Choinski J.
6-36-776-4
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-33-66-0
Nagal S.[3]
Gakhov I.
6-17-64
Ritschard A.
Squire H.
6-26-3
Choinski J.
Moro Canas A.
6-36-3
R16
Choinski J.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-27-5
Van Assche L.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Nagal S.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-1
Ritschard A.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Squire H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-06-2
Moro Canas A.
Rodionov J.[8]
3-67-647-61
R32
Kasnikowski M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-46-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Janvier M.
6-726-37-62
Barrios Vera T.
Hassan B.
6-46-0
Blancaneaux G.
Poertner L.
6-17-67
Ritschard A.
Ramos A.[7]
6-47-62
Altmaier D.[1]
Topo M.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[3]
Basilashvili N.
6-21-66-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Holmgren A.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-666-2
Gakhov I.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-3
Squire H.
Vallejo A.
6-36-2
Marterer M.[4]
Masur D.
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-736-2
Moro Canas A.
Gill F.
6-47-5
Heller P.
Molleker R.
5-76-47-5
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
6-46-2