James Trotter vs Christian Langmo — Tyler CH Round of 16

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Trotter J.
6-3 6-4
Langmo C.
Trotter J.
662
Langmo C.
340

James Trotter defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 6-4 in the Tyler CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Trotter closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.5
7.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trotter J.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
23
Break points saved·Even
90
88
Break points won·Even
2
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
26
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+126 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1254
6.8Overall Elo 1414
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.1
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Langmo C.
Freshness·Even
61
65

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3