Andrew Paulson vs Alibek Kachmazov — Prostejov CH Round of 32

Prostejov CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andrew Paulson
CZE
Andrew Paulson
#601ATP
1452ELO
1427Clay ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1396Clay ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Paulson A.
6-4 4-6 6-4
Kachmazov A.
Paulson A.
6462
Kachmazov A.
4641

Andrew Paulson defeated Alibek Kachmazov 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the Prostejov CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrew Paulson edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paulson A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Kachmazov A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paulson A.

Serve advantage — Kachmazov A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paulson A.Kachmazov A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (43 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paulson A.Kachmazov A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
2
49
Break points saved·Dominant
40
82
Break points won·Clear edge
3
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paulson A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kachmazov A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+30 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1396
4.5Overall Elo 1452
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1490
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kym J.
Tseng C.
6-23-66-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Djere L.[1]
6-36-4
Kym J.
Cachin P.[3]
6-31-66-4
Quarter-finals
Kym J.
Jacquet K.
6-46-4
Djere L.[1]
Neumayer L.
7-656-2
Tseng C.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-4
Cachin P.[3]
Albot R.[6]
3-67-56-2
R16
Tseng C.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-46-2
Djere L.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-46-3
Kym J.
Nishioka Y.[2]
6-46-3
Neumayer L.
Svrcina D.[8]
6-06-2
Vrbensky M.
Passaro F.[5]
4-66-46-4
Albot R.[6]
Paulson A.
6-726-47-5
Cachin P.[3]
De Loore J.
7-696-3
Jacquet K.
Sachko V.
6-24-66-2
R32
Kym J.
Gea A.
6-46-3
Passaro F.[5]
Molcan A.
6-16-4
Albot R.[6]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-34-67-63
Campana Lee G.
Klizan M.
7-54-66-2
Djere L.[1]
Skatov T.
6-46-2
Svrcina D.[8]
Royer V.
6-776-36-3
Neumayer L.
Vesely J.
6-46-2
Kopriva V.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-46-4
Tseng C.
Kodat T.
6-16-3
Vrbensky M.
Safwat M.
6-36-4
Paulson A.
Kachmazov A.
6-44-66-4
De Loore J.
Krumich M.
6-16-0
Cachin P.[3]
Novak D.
6-22-66-0
Sachko V.
Blanchet U.[7]
7-627-5
Jacquet K.
Onclin G.
6-06-4
Nishioka Y.[2]
Soto M.
7-56-3