Mikhail Kukushkin vs Paul Jubb — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1510Grass ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
grass
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1445Grass ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Kukushkin M.
1-6 6-3 6-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
1662
Jubb P.
6321

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Paul Jubb 1-6 6-3 6-2 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
84
Break points won·Dominant
41
6
Deciding sets·Even
41
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jubb P.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+65 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Grass Elo 1445
6.8Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1426
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.4
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kukushkin M.Jubb P.
Freshness·
—
100

Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.
Riedi L.
7-687-5
Semi-finals
Harris L.
Harris B.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Nakashima B.[6]
6-43-66-1
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.[6]
Svajda Z.
7-676-3
Harris B.
Kukushkin M.
5-77-657-64
Harris L.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-36-1
Riedi L.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
R16
Harris L.
Vukic A.[7]
6-17-68
Kukushkin M.
Jubb P.
1-66-36-2
Harris B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-64
Zhukayev B.
Duckworth J.
6-47-64
Mochizuki S.
Mcdonald M.[5]
2-66-46-2
Riedi L.
Shimabukuro S.
5-76-46-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Fonseca J.
6-26-746-0
Svajda Z.
Evans D.[2]
4-67-656-3
R32
Svajda Z.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-64
Harris B.
Shang J.[8]
6-37-68
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kukushkin M.
Fery A.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.
Nava E.
2-66-37-63
Duckworth J.
Jasika O.
3-67-636-0
Zhukayev B.
Cressy M.
6-46-3
Harris L.
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vukic A.[7]
Shapovalov D.
6-37-60
Mcdonald M.[5]
Bolt A.
7-636-0
Mochizuki S.
Atmane T.
6-746-16-4
Riedi L.
Stricker D.
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Ruusuvuori E.[3]
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Bellucci M.
6-747-57-64
Fonseca J.
Edmund K.
6-26-1
Evans D.[2]
Walton A.
6-45-77-68