James Trotter vs Brandon Holt — Tyler CH Final

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Final
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Trotter J.
6-2 7-6
Holt B.
Trotter J.
6772
Holt B.
2630

James Trotter defeated Brandon Holt 6-2 7-6 in the Tyler CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — James Trotter came in ranked #432, leading the head-to-head 1–0. James Trotter extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: James Trotter closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosQ1clayJames Trotter6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trotter J.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
85
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Even
82
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Holt B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1380
Surface ELO
6.6+127 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1414
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1537
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Holt B.
Freshness·
61
—

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3