Brandon Holt vs Yusuke Takahashi — Tyler CH Round of 32

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
Yusuke Takahashi
JPN
Yusuke Takahashi
#671ATP
1268ELO
1243Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLW
Holt B.
6-2 5-7 6-1
Takahashi Y.
Holt B.
6562
Takahashi Y.
2711

Brandon Holt defeated Yusuke Takahashi 6-2 5-7 6-1 in the Tyler CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Takahashi Y.

Takahashi Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Takahashi Y.
1st serve in·Even
67%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Takahashi Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
0
Break points saved·Dominant
85
36
Break points won·Clear edge
31
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Takahashi Y.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+264 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Hard Elo 1243
8.3Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1268
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3