Facundo Mena vs Emilio Gomez — Santa Fe CH Round of 32

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
Mena F.
5-7 6-3 7-5
Gomez E.
Mena F.
5672
Gomez E.
7351

Facundo Mena defeated Emilio Gomez 5-7 6-3 7-5 in the Santa Fe CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Gomez came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Facundo Mena claimed a first win over Emilio Gomez in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-08SantiagoQ1clayEmilio Gomez6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
44%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
9
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
77
Break points won·Clear edge
7
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
28
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Gomez E.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Gomez E.
Freshness·
70
—

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Collarini A.[7]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mena F.
Blanch U.
7-637-65
Collarini A.[7]
Villanueva G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Collarini A.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-26-3
Mena F.
Hilderbrand T.
6-47-63
Villanueva G.
Farjat T.
5-77-56-4
Blanch U.
Midon L.
6-46-4
R16
Blanch U.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Dellien H.[1]
5-2
Mena F.
Justo G.
7-626-2
Collarini A.[7]
Torres J.
6-36-1
Farjat T.
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Monferrer E.
6-46-4
Hilderbrand T.
Bueno G.[5]
5-76-46-1
Midon L.
Zanellato N.
6-26-2
R32
Dellien H.[1]
Leite W.
6-46-4
Bueno G.[5]
Blanch D.
7-696-3
Barreto Sanchez D.
Habib H.[4]
7-57-65
Justo G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
6-37-5
Farjat T.
Aboian V.
6-26-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Torres J.
Rodriguez L.
6-16-1
Collarini A.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-17-61
Villanueva G.
Estevez J.
6-16-3
Monferrer E.
Guillen Meza A.[6]
7-52-66-3
Hilderbrand T.
Aboian L.
3-66-37-64
Mena F.
Gomez E.
5-76-37-5
Midon L.
Sakamoto P.[8]
6-24-67-5
Zanellato N.
Alvarez N.
4-66-36-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Lobanov A.
4-66-36-1
Blanch U.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
6-46-3