Ivan Gakhov vs Daniel Elahi Galan — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL6
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
Gakhov I.
6-4 6-3
Galan D.
Gakhov I.
662
Galan D.
430

Ivan Gakhov defeated Daniel Elahi Galan 6-4 6-3 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Elahi Galan came in ranked #304, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Galan D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Galan D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Galan D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Galan D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
92
Break points won·Clear edge
9
21
Deciding sets·Even
59
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Galan D.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
6.3+108 Clay Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1531
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-16-756-3
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[3]
Van Assche L.[5]
6-27-65
Ritschard A.
Choinski J.
6-36-776-4
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-33-66-0
Nagal S.[3]
Gakhov I.
6-17-64
Ritschard A.
Squire H.
6-26-3
Choinski J.
Moro Canas A.
6-36-3
R16
Choinski J.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-27-5
Van Assche L.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Nagal S.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-1
Ritschard A.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Squire H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-06-2
Moro Canas A.
Rodionov J.[8]
3-67-647-61
R32
Kasnikowski M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-46-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Janvier M.
6-726-37-62
Barrios Vera T.
Hassan B.
6-46-0
Blancaneaux G.
Poertner L.
6-17-67
Ritschard A.
Ramos A.[7]
6-47-62
Altmaier D.[1]
Topo M.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[3]
Basilashvili N.
6-21-66-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Holmgren A.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-666-2
Gakhov I.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-3
Squire H.
Vallejo A.
6-36-2
Marterer M.[4]
Masur D.
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-736-2
Moro Canas A.
Gill F.
6-47-5
Heller P.
Molleker R.
5-76-47-5
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
6-46-2