Zachary Svajda vs Daniel Evans — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zachary Svajda
USA
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1657Grass ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
grass
Daniel Evans
GBR2
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1584Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Svajda Z.
4-6 7-6 6-3
Evans D.
Svajda Z.
47762
Evans D.
66531

Zachary Svajda defeated Daniel Evans 4-6 7-6 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Evans D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Even
69
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
97
Break points won·Slight edge
66
61
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
75
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Evans D.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.2+73 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Grass Elo 1584
6.4Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1588
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Evans D.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.
Riedi L.
7-687-5
Semi-finals
Harris L.
Harris B.
6-46-4
Riedi L.
Nakashima B.[6]
6-43-66-1
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.[6]
Svajda Z.
7-676-3
Harris B.
Kukushkin M.
5-77-657-64
Harris L.
Zhukayev B.
3-66-36-1
Riedi L.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
R16
Harris L.
Vukic A.[7]
6-17-68
Kukushkin M.
Jubb P.
1-66-36-2
Harris B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-64
Zhukayev B.
Duckworth J.
6-47-64
Mochizuki S.
Mcdonald M.[5]
2-66-46-2
Riedi L.
Shimabukuro S.
5-76-46-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Fonseca J.
6-26-746-0
Svajda Z.
Evans D.[2]
4-67-656-3
R32
Svajda Z.
Brouwer G.
6-11-67-64
Harris B.
Shang J.[8]
6-37-68
Jubb P.
Michelsen A.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kukushkin M.
Fery A.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.
Nava E.
2-66-37-63
Duckworth J.
Jasika O.
3-67-636-0
Zhukayev B.
Cressy M.
6-46-3
Harris L.
Huesler M.
7-56-756-3
Vukic A.[7]
Shapovalov D.
6-37-60
Mcdonald M.[5]
Bolt A.
7-636-0
Mochizuki S.
Atmane T.
6-746-16-4
Riedi L.
Stricker D.
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Ruusuvuori E.[3]
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[6]
Bellucci M.
6-747-57-64
Fonseca J.
Edmund K.
6-26-1
Evans D.[2]
Walton A.
6-45-77-68