Seong Chan Hong vs Ernesto Escobedo — Tyler CH Round of 16

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
KOR3
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Hong S.
3-6 6-4 6-2
Escobedo E.
Hong S.
3662
Escobedo E.
6421

Seong Chan Hong defeated Ernesto Escobedo 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the Tyler CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
84
Break points won·Clear edge
30
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escobedo E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
2.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.4
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-27-63
Semi-finals
Holt B.
Draxl L.[8]
6-47-5
Trotter J.
Wong C.[2]
6-24-67-64
Quarter-finals
Wong C.[2]
Quinn E.
6-26-2
Holt B.
Galarneau A.[1]
3-66-36-1
Draxl L.[8]
Hong S.[3]
6-26-2
Trotter J.
Shelbayh A.[6]
6-27-5
R16
Hong S.[3]
Escobedo E.
3-66-46-2
Wong C.[2]
Kozlov S.
4-66-44-1
Trotter J.
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
7-616-1
Holt B.
Krueger M.[7]
1-67-647-64
Draxl L.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-777-56-0
Quinn E.
Moriya H.
7-657-5
R32
Moriya H.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-51-0
Kozlov S.
Bicknell B.
6-36-3
Shimizu Y.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Wong C.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Svajda T.
6-47-65
Quinn E.
Borg L.
4-66-26-2
Langmo C.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-2
Galarneau A.[1]
Quan R.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Takahashi Y.
6-25-76-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Hong S.[3]
Andrade A.
6-22-67-61
Escobedo E.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-3
Draxl L.[8]
Chappell N.
6-16-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-1
Kuzuhara B.
Bouzige M.
6-767-676-3