Strong Kirchheimer vs Leo Borg — Tyler CH Qualifying Round 2

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Strong Kirchheimer
USA9
Strong Kirchheimer
#634ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
hard
SWE3
Leo Borg
#522ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWW
Kirchheimer S.
6-4 6-2
Borg L.
Kirchheimer S.
662
Borg L.
420

Strong Kirchheimer defeated Leo Borg 6-4 6-2 in the Tyler CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kirchheimer S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Borg L.

Borg L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Serve advantage — Kirchheimer S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kirchheimer S.Borg L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kirchheimer S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Borg L.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 133 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
0.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 11
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[4]
Valiev I.
6-25-76-4
Quinn E.[1]
Rybakov A.[12]
2-66-27-62
Bouzige M.
Smith K.
6-46-4
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Borg L.[3]
6-46-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Ilagan A.[5]
4-66-46-3
Langmo C.[10]
Sinclair C.[6]
7-646-3
Q1
Quinn E.[1]
Neff A.
6-46-756-3
Langmo C.[10]
Kumar P.
6-36-4
Rybakov A.[12]
Nefve A.
3-66-33-0
Kirchheimer S.[9]
Urrea A.
6-36-1
Smith K.
Mukund S.[2]
6-47-5
Bouzige M.
Imai S.[11]
6-41-66-4
Borg L.[3]
Tracy J.
7-57-5
Peliwo F.[4]
Mayo K.
2-66-06-4
Valiev I.
Pecotic M.[8]
6-26-1
Ilagan A.[5]
Corwin F.
2-67-56-3
Escobedo E.[7]
Frusina A.
6-16-4
Sinclair C.[6]
Cassone M.
6-47-5