Ulises Blanch vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Santa Fe CH Round of 32

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
BOL2
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Blanch U.
6-4 6-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Blanch U.
662
Dellien Velasco M.
430

Ulises Blanch defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-4 6-3 in the Santa Fe CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ulises Blanch closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
19
Break points saved·Dominant
83
28
Break points won·Clear edge
2
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
37
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Dellien Velasco M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.8
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.7
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Collarini A.[7]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mena F.
Blanch U.
7-637-65
Collarini A.[7]
Villanueva G.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Collarini A.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
5-76-26-3
Mena F.
Hilderbrand T.
6-47-63
Villanueva G.
Farjat T.
5-77-56-4
Blanch U.
Midon L.
6-46-4
R16
Blanch U.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Dellien H.[1]
5-2
Mena F.
Justo G.
7-626-2
Collarini A.[7]
Torres J.
6-36-1
Farjat T.
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Monferrer E.
6-46-4
Hilderbrand T.
Bueno G.[5]
5-76-46-1
Midon L.
Zanellato N.
6-26-2
R32
Dellien H.[1]
Leite W.
6-46-4
Bueno G.[5]
Blanch D.
7-696-3
Barreto Sanchez D.
Habib H.[4]
7-57-65
Justo G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
6-37-5
Farjat T.
Aboian V.
6-26-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Casanova H.
6-26-1
Torres J.
Rodriguez L.
6-16-1
Collarini A.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-17-61
Villanueva G.
Estevez J.
6-16-3
Monferrer E.
Guillen Meza A.[6]
7-52-66-3
Hilderbrand T.
Aboian L.
3-66-37-64
Mena F.
Gomez E.
5-76-37-5
Midon L.
Sakamoto P.[8]
6-24-67-5
Zanellato N.
Alvarez N.
4-66-36-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Lobanov A.
4-66-36-1
Blanch U.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
6-46-3