Sumit Nagal vs Luca Van Assche — Heilbronn CH Semi-final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Sumit Nagal
IND3
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
Luca Van Assche
FRA5
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
Nagal S.
6-2 7-6
Van Assche L.
Nagal S.
6772
Van Assche L.
2650

Sumit Nagal defeated Luca Van Assche 6-2 7-6 in the Heilbronn CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
67
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
91
Break points won·Dominant
35
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Van Assche L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1538
Surface ELO
6.8+101 Clay Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1701
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
77

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-16-756-3
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[3]
Van Assche L.[5]
6-27-65
Ritschard A.
Choinski J.
6-36-776-4
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-33-66-0
Nagal S.[3]
Gakhov I.
6-17-64
Ritschard A.
Squire H.
6-26-3
Choinski J.
Moro Canas A.
6-36-3
R16
Choinski J.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-27-5
Van Assche L.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Nagal S.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-1
Ritschard A.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Squire H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-06-2
Moro Canas A.
Rodionov J.[8]
3-67-647-61
R32
Kasnikowski M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-46-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Janvier M.
6-726-37-62
Barrios Vera T.
Hassan B.
6-46-0
Blancaneaux G.
Poertner L.
6-17-67
Ritschard A.
Ramos A.[7]
6-47-62
Altmaier D.[1]
Topo M.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[3]
Basilashvili N.
6-21-66-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Holmgren A.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-666-2
Gakhov I.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-3
Squire H.
Vallejo A.
6-36-2
Marterer M.[4]
Masur D.
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-736-2
Moro Canas A.
Gill F.
6-47-5
Heller P.
Molleker R.
5-76-47-5
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
6-46-2