Luca Van Assche vs Maxime Janvier — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA5
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
Maxime Janvier
FRA
Maxime Janvier
#566ATP
1297ELO
1261Clay ELO
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Van Assche L.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Janvier M.
Van Assche L.
626772
Janvier M.
773621

Luca Van Assche defeated Maxime Janvier 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Janvier M.

Janvier M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Serve advantage — Van Assche L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Janvier M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Janvier M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
71
Break points won·Dominant
61
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Janvier M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.3+378 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Clay Elo 1261
9.9Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1297
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Janvier M.
Freshness·Slight edge
77
83

Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Janvier M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-16-756-3
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[3]
Van Assche L.[5]
6-27-65
Ritschard A.
Choinski J.
6-36-776-4
Quarter-finals
Van Assche L.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-33-66-0
Nagal S.[3]
Gakhov I.
6-17-64
Ritschard A.
Squire H.
6-26-3
Choinski J.
Moro Canas A.
6-36-3
R16
Choinski J.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-27-5
Van Assche L.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-36-2
Nagal S.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-1
Ritschard A.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-3
Squire H.
Marterer M.[4]
6-06-2
Moro Canas A.
Rodionov J.[8]
3-67-647-61
R32
Kasnikowski M.
Fanselow S.
4-66-46-1
Van Assche L.[5]
Janvier M.
6-726-37-62
Barrios Vera T.
Hassan B.
6-46-0
Blancaneaux G.
Poertner L.
6-17-67
Ritschard A.
Ramos A.[7]
6-47-62
Altmaier D.[1]
Topo M.
6-37-64
Nagal S.[3]
Basilashvili N.
6-21-66-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Holmgren A.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-666-2
Gakhov I.
Galan D.[6]
6-46-3
Squire H.
Vallejo A.
6-36-2
Marterer M.[4]
Masur D.
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-736-2
Moro Canas A.
Gill F.
6-47-5
Heller P.
Molleker R.
5-76-47-5
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
6-46-2