Nerman Fatic vs Adrian Andreev — Zagreb CH Round of 32

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 3 June 2024
clay
BUL
Adrian Andreev
#1122ATP
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Fatic N.
6-1 0-0
Andreev A.
Fatic N.
60–
Andreev A.
10–

Nerman Fatic advanced when Adrian Andreev retired 6-1 0-0 in the Zagreb CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Andreev A.

Andreev A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Andreev A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Andreev A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
53
Break points won·Clear edge
36
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Andreev A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
6.3
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[1]
Mikrut L.
7-56-0
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
Roca Batalla O.[3]
4-66-46-4
Mikrut L.
Dodig M.
6-746-26-2
Quarter-finals
Mikrut L.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-32-67-5
Dzumhur D.[1]
Hardt N.[7]
6-36-4
Roca Batalla O.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
6-36-2
Dodig M.
Popko D.
7-54-66-4
R16
Pacheco Mendez R.
Couacaud E.
6-717-56-2
Dalla Valle E.
Maestrelli F.
7-646-2
Dodig M.
Serdarusic N.
4-66-16-2
Dzumhur D.[1]
Fatic N.
6-24-66-3
Hardt N.[7]
Erhard M.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.[3]
Misolic F.
6-47-65
Popko D.
Prizmic D.[9]
6-26-4
Mikrut L.
Rocha H.[8]
6-36-2
R32
Erhard M.
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Serdarusic N.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-16-2
Fatic N.
Andreev A.
6-10-0
Dzumhur D.[1]
Jorda Sanchis D.
5-76-46-2
Pacheco Mendez R.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-46-3
Couacaud E.
Den Ouden G.
3-67-57-65
Hardt N.[7]
Demin Y.
6-766-26-1
Roca Batalla O.[3]
Elias G.
7-666-4
Misolic F.
Zakharov A.
7-655-76-3
Dalla Valle E.
Noguchi R.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Halys Q.[5]
2-66-46-4
Dodig M.
Taberner C.
6-30-66-1
Popko D.
Olivo R.
6-726-27-5
Prizmic D.[9]
Dougaz A.
6-33-67-5
Rocha H.[8]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-36-4
Mikrut L.
Horvat R.
6-17-62