Chun Hsin Tseng vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Vicenza CH Quarter-final

Vicenza CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
clay
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Tseng C.
6-4 6-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Tseng C.
662
Dellien Velasco M.
430

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-4 6-3 in the Vicenza CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (171 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
19
Break points saved·Dominant
83
28
Break points won·Even
15
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
23
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Dellien Velasco M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+173 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1368
6.9Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1379
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Trungelliti M.[5]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Passaro F.[1]
6-36-3
Trungelliti M.[5]
Fatic N.
6-34-67-5
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.
Andreev A.
6-46-3
Passaro F.[1]
Popko D.
6-33-66-4
Tseng C.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Trungelliti M.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[3]
2-66-37-63
R16
Popko D.
Arnaboldi F.
6-36-1
Passaro F.[1]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Prado Angelo J.
7-656-0
Dellien Velasco M.
Travaglia S.[8]
6-16-2
Trungelliti M.[5]
Berrettini J.
6-46-3
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Andreev A.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-36-3
Fatic N.
Dougaz A.
6-27-61
R32
Berrettini J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-667-65
Fatic N.
Skatov T.
6-46-0
Tseng C.
Yevseyev D.[4]
7-666-3
Passaro F.[1]
Janvier M.
6-16-2
Cecchinato M.
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Popko D.
Iannaccone F.
6-42-66-1
Arnaboldi F.
Sachko V.[7]
7-56-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gaubas V.
6-46-726-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Kirkin E.
6-36-1
Travaglia S.[8]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[5]
Carboni L.
6-46-2
Fonio G.
Agamenone F.
7-657-5
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-13-66-2
Olivieri G.[6]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-3
Andreev A.
Kachmazov A.
7-6107-5
Dougaz A.
Piros Z.[2]
7-56-4