Trevor Svajda vs Andres Martin — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Trevor Svajda
#514ATP
1485ELO
1451Hard ELO
20 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
hard
Andres Martin
USA
Andres Martin
1337ELO
1332Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLW
Svajda T.
6-4 7-6
Martin A.
Svajda T.
6772
Martin A.
4650

Trevor Svajda defeated Andres Martin 6-4 7-6 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda T.serving73% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Martin A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Svajda T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Svajda T.Martin A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda T.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 112 days (−1.5)
Martin A.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 182 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.1+119 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1332
7.4Overall Elo 1485
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1337
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda T.Martin A.
Freshness·Dominant
100
62

Svajda T.: 15 days rest · Martin A.: played today · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Shelbayh A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Basavareddy N.
7-636-0
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Galarneau A.[1]
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.
Quan R.
6-46-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Holt B.
7-642-67-5
Basavareddy N.
Svajda T.
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[5]
6-10-0
Svajda T.
Martin A.
6-47-65
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mayo A.
7-676-3
Holt B.
Hong S.[3]
6-26-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Williams C.
6-43-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Quan R.
Andrade A.
6-33-66-3
R32
Shelbayh A.[8]
Bicknell B.
7-646-2
Holt B.
Mukund S.
6-03-66-2
Andrade A.
Wong C.[2]
6-756-46-3
Tomic B.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Wu T.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-1
Mayo A.
Chappell N.
6-35-77-64
Krueger M.[6]
Draxl L.
6-33-66-4
Hong S.[3]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Williams C.
Takahashi Y.
6-42-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.[7]
7-56-4
Langmo C.
Ramanathan R.
7-56-2
Svajda T.
Escobedo E.
6-36-4
Martin A.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-616-2
Shimizu Y.
Smith K.
7-56-3
Quan R.
Kozlov S.
6-17-5