Bernard Tomic vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS5
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Tomic B.
3-6 6-2 6-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Tomic B.
3662
Kwiatkowski T.
6231

Bernard Tomic defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 3-6 6-2 6-3 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
5
Break points saved·Dominant
92
65
Break points won·Even
4
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Kwiatkowski T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Kwiatkowski T.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Shelbayh A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Basavareddy N.
7-636-0
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Galarneau A.[1]
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.
Quan R.
6-46-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Holt B.
7-642-67-5
Basavareddy N.
Svajda T.
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[5]
6-10-0
Svajda T.
Martin A.
6-47-65
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mayo A.
7-676-3
Holt B.
Hong S.[3]
6-26-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Williams C.
6-43-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Quan R.
Andrade A.
6-33-66-3
R32
Shelbayh A.[8]
Bicknell B.
7-646-2
Holt B.
Mukund S.
6-03-66-2
Andrade A.
Wong C.[2]
6-756-46-3
Tomic B.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Wu T.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-1
Mayo A.
Chappell N.
6-35-77-64
Krueger M.[6]
Draxl L.
6-33-66-4
Hong S.[3]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Williams C.
Takahashi Y.
6-42-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.[7]
7-56-4
Langmo C.
Ramanathan R.
7-56-2
Svajda T.
Escobedo E.
6-36-4
Martin A.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-616-2
Shimizu Y.
Smith K.
7-56-3
Quan R.
Kozlov S.
6-17-5