Rudy Quan vs Stefan Kozlov — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Rudy Quan
#1219ATP
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
hard
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#317ATP
1429ELO
1408Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Quan R.
6-1 7-5
Kozlov S.
Quan R.
672
Kozlov S.
150

Rudy Quan defeated Stefan Kozlov 6-1 7-5 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Rudy Quan came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quan R.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Quan R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Quan R.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
56%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (16 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quan R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kozlov S.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Quan R.Kozlov S.
Freshness·
—
62

Kozlov S.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Shelbayh A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Basavareddy N.
7-636-0
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Galarneau A.[1]
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.
Quan R.
6-46-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Holt B.
7-642-67-5
Basavareddy N.
Svajda T.
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[5]
6-10-0
Svajda T.
Martin A.
6-47-65
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mayo A.
7-676-3
Holt B.
Hong S.[3]
6-26-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Williams C.
6-43-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Quan R.
Andrade A.
6-33-66-3
R32
Shelbayh A.[8]
Bicknell B.
7-646-2
Holt B.
Mukund S.
6-03-66-2
Andrade A.
Wong C.[2]
6-756-46-3
Tomic B.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Wu T.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-1
Mayo A.
Chappell N.
6-35-77-64
Krueger M.[6]
Draxl L.
6-33-66-4
Hong S.[3]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Williams C.
Takahashi Y.
6-42-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.[7]
7-56-4
Langmo C.
Ramanathan R.
7-56-2
Svajda T.
Escobedo E.
6-36-4
Martin A.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-616-2
Shimizu Y.
Smith K.
7-56-3
Quan R.
Kozlov S.
6-17-5