Brandon Holt vs Seong Chan Hong — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
hard
KOR3
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Holt B.
6-2 6-3
Hong S.
Holt B.
662
Hong S.
230

Brandon Holt defeated Seong Chan Hong 6-2 6-3 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Hong S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
77
Break points won·Even
31
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hong S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Shelbayh A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Basavareddy N.
7-636-0
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Galarneau A.[1]
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.
Quan R.
6-46-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Holt B.
7-642-67-5
Basavareddy N.
Svajda T.
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[5]
6-10-0
Svajda T.
Martin A.
6-47-65
Galarneau A.[1]
Wu T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[6]
Mayo A.
7-676-3
Holt B.
Hong S.[3]
6-26-3
Shelbayh A.[8]
Williams C.
6-43-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Langmo C.
7-57-5
Quan R.
Andrade A.
6-33-66-3
R32
Shelbayh A.[8]
Bicknell B.
7-646-2
Holt B.
Mukund S.
6-03-66-2
Andrade A.
Wong C.[2]
6-756-46-3
Tomic B.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-26-3
Galarneau A.[1]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Wu T.
Mejia N.
6-34-66-1
Mayo A.
Chappell N.
6-35-77-64
Krueger M.[6]
Draxl L.
6-33-66-4
Hong S.[3]
Cassone M.
6-43-66-2
Williams C.
Takahashi Y.
6-42-66-4
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.[7]
7-56-4
Langmo C.
Ramanathan R.
7-56-2
Svajda T.
Escobedo E.
6-36-4
Martin A.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-616-2
Shimizu Y.
Smith K.
7-56-3
Quan R.
Kozlov S.
6-17-5