Marco Trungelliti vs Nerman Fatic — Vicenza CH Semi-final

Vicenza CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Marco Trungelliti
ARG5
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 May 2024
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Trungelliti M.
6-3 4-6 7-5
Fatic N.
Trungelliti M.
6472
Fatic N.
3651

Marco Trungelliti defeated Nerman Fatic 6-3 4-6 7-5 in the Vicenza CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
63
Break points won·Clear edge
24
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+143 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1478
7.0Overall Elo 1627
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Fatic N.
Freshness·
89
—

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Trungelliti M.[5]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Passaro F.[1]
6-36-3
Trungelliti M.[5]
Fatic N.
6-34-67-5
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.
Andreev A.
6-46-3
Passaro F.[1]
Popko D.
6-33-66-4
Tseng C.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Trungelliti M.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[3]
2-66-37-63
R16
Popko D.
Arnaboldi F.
6-36-1
Passaro F.[1]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Prado Angelo J.
7-656-0
Dellien Velasco M.
Travaglia S.[8]
6-16-2
Trungelliti M.[5]
Berrettini J.
6-46-3
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Andreev A.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-36-3
Fatic N.
Dougaz A.
6-27-61
R32
Berrettini J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
7-667-65
Fatic N.
Skatov T.
6-46-0
Tseng C.
Yevseyev D.[4]
7-666-3
Passaro F.[1]
Janvier M.
6-16-2
Cecchinato M.
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Popko D.
Iannaccone F.
6-42-66-1
Arnaboldi F.
Sachko V.[7]
7-56-1
Prado Angelo J.
Gaubas V.
6-46-726-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Kirkin E.
6-36-1
Travaglia S.[8]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[5]
Carboni L.
6-46-2
Fonio G.
Agamenone F.
7-657-5
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-13-66-2
Olivieri G.[6]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-3
Andreev A.
Kachmazov A.
7-6107-5
Dougaz A.
Piros Z.[2]
7-56-4