Alexander Weis vs Johan Nikles — Skopje CH Round of 32

Skopje CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Weis A.
3-6 7-6 6-4
Nikles J.
Weis A.
37762
Nikles J.
66341

Alexander Weis defeated Johan Nikles 3-6 7-6 6-4 in the Skopje CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Weis A.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weis A.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (49 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weis A.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Even
4
7
Break points saved·Dominant
50
22
Break points won·Clear edge
13
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
29
Tiebreaks·
8
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Weis A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nikles J.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Schwaerzler J.
Majchrzak K.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Schwaerzler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-746-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Seggerman R.
7-626-766-2
Quarter-finals
Schwaerzler J.
Paulson A.
3-66-46-4
Majchrzak K.
Weis A.
6-37-65
Seggerman R.
Oberleitner N.
2-67-657-66
Campana Lee G.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-2
R16
Cecchinato M.
Jianu F.[7]
6-36-2
Oberleitner N.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
6-07-63
Weis A.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-66-46-2
Majchrzak K.
Forejtek J.
6-33-66-1
Seggerman R.
Dodig M.
0-67-666-2
Campana Lee G.
Fonio G.
6-16-2
Paulson A.
Basic M.
6-46-3
Schwaerzler J.
Kirkin E.[2]
6-26-1
R32
Seggerman R.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
1-0
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Luz O.
6-757-694-2
Schwaerzler J.
Fomin S.
5-77-53-0
Dodig M.
Gautier A.
7-53-66-4
Campana Lee G.
Clarke J.
6-16-746-3
Kirkin E.[2]
Mikrut L.
6-47-68
Weis A.
Nikles J.
3-67-636-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Tseng C.[1]
6-26-4
Forejtek J.
Basilashvili N.
6-26-2
Majchrzak K.
Onclin G.[8]
6-26-3
Oberleitner N.
Artnak B.
6-47-5
Jianu F.[7]
Cina F.
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.
Lazarov A.
7-656-1
Fonio G.
Nijboer R.
6-26-1
Basic M.
Vincent Ruggeri S.[6]
7-676-1
Paulson A.
Vesely J.
6-47-65