Martina Trevisan vs Nao Hibino — Rabat Round of 32

Rabat · WTA · Round of 32
Martina Trevisan
ITA
Martina Trevisan
#405WTA
1462ELO
1450Clay ELO
32 yrs · 160 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
clay
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#235WTA
1560ELO
1487Clay ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLWW
Trevisan M.
7-5 4-6 6-3
Hibino N.
Trevisan M.
7462
Hibino N.
5631

Martina Trevisan defeated Nao Hibino 7-5 4-6 6-3 in the Rabat round of 32 on clay. Martina Trevisan extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-20MiamiR64hardMartina Trevisan6-4 6-3
2022-10-17Guadalajara 2R64hardMartina Trevisan6-4 6-3
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardMartina Trevisan6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Trevisan M.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Hibino N.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Trevisan M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trevisan M.Hibino N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trevisan M.Hibino N.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
51
39
Break points won·Even
90
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
59
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
71
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trevisan M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Hibino N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9Clay Elo 1450
Surface ELO
5.1+37 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1462
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1560
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
3-set count
7.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trevisan M.Hibino N.
Freshness·
—
89

Hibino N.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CPartly cloudy
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 62%

Draw

Final
Stearns P.
Sherif M.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Stearns P.
Tomova V.
6-767-57-64
Sherif M.
Rakhimova K.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Sherif M.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-36-3
Rakhimova K.
Cocciaretto E.[7]
7-57-5
Stearns P.
Bronzetti L.[4]
6-44-67-5
Tomova V.
Siegemund L.
6-46-3
R16
Rakhimova K.
Rosatello C.
4-0
Sherif M.
Carle M.
6-36-2
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Podoroska N.
7-53-66-3
Bronzetti L.[4]
Trevisan M.
6-26-3
Cocciaretto E.[7]
Bai Z.
6-46-2
Stearns P.
Wang X.[6]
6-36-1
Tomova V.
Wang Y.
7-646-0
Siegemund L.
Osorio C.
6-46-4
R32
Rakhimova K.
Townsend T.
2-0
Osorio C.
Avanesyan E.
3-66-44-0
Siegemund L.
Blinkova A.[2]
6-17-64
Bronzetti L.[4]
El Allami M.
6-16-0
Rosatello C.
Yuan Y.[1]
7-671-66-4
Bai Z.
Day K.
6-37-64
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Dart H.
6-26-0
Trevisan M.
Hibino N.
7-54-66-3
Wang Y.
Zhu L.[8]
4-66-06-2
Sherif M.
El Aouni A.
6-26-1
Tomova V.
Cengiz B.
6-26-1
Wang X.[6]
Brancaccio N.
7-657-5
Carle M.
Rus A.[5]
6-36-3
Stearns P.
Krunic A.
5-76-26-1
Cocciaretto E.[7]
Kabbaj Y.
6-36-4
Podoroska N.
Maria T.
6-26-4