Timofey Skatov vs Norbert Gombos — Augsburg CH Round of 16

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Timofey Skatov
KAZ1
Timofey Skatov
#172ATP
1544ELO
1531Clay ELO
$107kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#364ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Skatov T.
6-4 2-6 6-1
Gombos N.
Skatov T.
6262
Gombos N.
4611

Timofey Skatov defeated Norbert Gombos 6-4 2-6 6-1 in the Augsburg CH round of 16 on clay. Timofey Skatov claimed a first win over Norbert Gombos in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Timofey Skatov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardNorbert Gombos6-3 6-2 1-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Skatov T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Skatov T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Skatov T.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.4
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 125). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Skatov T.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
31
41
Break points saved·Even
81
83
Break points won·Clear edge
27
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
70
Tiebreaks·Even
35
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Skatov T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gombos N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+76 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Clay Elo 1455
5.6Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1472
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.1
Surface form
4.5
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Skatov T.Gombos N.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
69

Skatov T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Skatov T.[1]
Moller E.[8]
3-67-56-3
Semi-finals
Skatov T.[1]
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moller E.[8]
Bonadio R.
3-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Gomez F.
1-66-26-3
Skatov T.[1]
Kodat T.
7-646-4
Masur D.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Moller E.[8]
Taberner C.
6-44-66-4
R16
Moller E.[8]
Gentzsch T.
6-03-0
Bonadio R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-47-65
Masur D.
Gaubas V.
7-656-3
Skatov T.[1]
Gombos N.
6-42-66-1
Kodat T.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-1
Gerch L.
Michalski D.
3-66-36-2
Taberner C.
Vrbensky M.[4]
7-56-4
Gomez F.
Collarini A.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Masur D.
Geerts M.
6-15-76-4
Collarini A.[2]
Alves M.
6-36-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Vallejo A.[5]
6-46-3
Gombos N.
Picchione A.
6-45-76-4
Taberner C.
Echargui M.
6-46-3
Gaubas V.
Furness E.
7-626-3
Skatov T.[1]
Safwat M.
6-46-3
Kodat T.
Otte O.
7-674-66-3
Gerch L.
Giacomini L.
6-47-5
Michalski D.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-26-2
Moller E.[8]
Topo M.
6-47-5
Gentzsch T.
Gill F.
6-17-63
Vrbensky M.[4]
Gavrielides L.
6-16-1
Dedura Palomero D.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-717-56-2
Bonadio R.
Naw H.
6-36-0
Gomez F.
Potenza L.
6-16-0