Paul Jubb vs Daniil Glinka — Kachreti CH Quarter-final

Kachreti CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR5
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
hard
EST
Daniil Glinka
#167ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Jubb P.
6-4 6-4
Glinka D.
Jubb P.
662
Glinka D.
440

Paul Jubb defeated Daniil Glinka 6-4 6-4 in the Kachreti CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Paul Jubb edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Glinka D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Glinka D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Glinka D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
23
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Even
6
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
6
Tiebreaks·Even
73
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Glinka D.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1403
Surface ELO
6.6+88 Hard Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
3.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Glinka D.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
90

Jubb P.: 20 days rest · Glinka D.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bertrand R.
Bakshi A.
6-13-67-5
Semi-finals
Bakshi A.
Sekulic P.[1]
7-637-5
Bertrand R.
Jubb P.[5]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Sekulic P.[1]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-664-67-60
Jubb P.[5]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Bakshi A.
Mott B.
6-16-0
Bertrand R.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-36-3
R16
Sekulic P.[1]
Strombachs R.
7-667-66
Bertrand R.
Hussey G.[7]
7-56-4
Bakshi A.
Ursu V.[6]
6-26-4
Ramanathan R.[8]
Blanch U.
6-16-4
Mott B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-42-67-65
Gerasimov E.[3]
Soto M.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Glinka D.
Broom C.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Blanch U.
Purtseladze S.
7-647-65
Bertrand R.
Bobrov B.
6-26-0
Broom C.[2]
Cid R.
6-36-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Stewart H.
6-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Matsuda R.
7-646-4
Strombachs R.
Ayeni O.
6-42-67-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Oliel Y.
6-37-5
Mott B.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-5
Bakshi A.
Pawelski M.
6-26-4
Ursu V.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.[7]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-767-646-1
Soto M.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-16-2
Gerasimov E.[3]
Efstathiou M.
6-46-4
Jubb P.[5]
Kimhi O.
6-16-1
Celikbilek A.
Ilkel C.
6-756-46-3
Glinka D.
Erel Y.
6-27-64