Altug Celikbilek vs Cem Ilkel — Kachreti CH Round of 32

Kachreti CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Celikbilek A.
6-7 6-4 6-3
Ilkel C.
Celikbilek A.
65662
Ilkel C.
77431

Altug Celikbilek defeated Cem Ilkel 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Kachreti CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Serve advantage — Celikbilek A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Celikbilek A.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.9
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Celikbilek A.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
49
Break points won·Dominant
38
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Celikbilek A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Ilkel C.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bertrand R.
Bakshi A.
6-13-67-5
Semi-finals
Bakshi A.
Sekulic P.[1]
7-637-5
Bertrand R.
Jubb P.[5]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Sekulic P.[1]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-664-67-60
Jubb P.[5]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Bakshi A.
Mott B.
6-16-0
Bertrand R.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-36-3
R16
Sekulic P.[1]
Strombachs R.
7-667-66
Bertrand R.
Hussey G.[7]
7-56-4
Bakshi A.
Ursu V.[6]
6-26-4
Ramanathan R.[8]
Blanch U.
6-16-4
Mott B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-42-67-65
Gerasimov E.[3]
Soto M.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Glinka D.
Broom C.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Blanch U.
Purtseladze S.
7-647-65
Bertrand R.
Bobrov B.
6-26-0
Broom C.[2]
Cid R.
6-36-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Stewart H.
6-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Matsuda R.
7-646-4
Strombachs R.
Ayeni O.
6-42-67-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Oliel Y.
6-37-5
Mott B.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-5
Bakshi A.
Pawelski M.
6-26-4
Ursu V.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.[7]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-767-646-1
Soto M.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-16-2
Gerasimov E.[3]
Efstathiou M.
6-46-4
Jubb P.[5]
Kimhi O.
6-16-1
Celikbilek A.
Ilkel C.
6-756-46-3
Glinka D.
Erel Y.
6-27-64