Charles Broom vs Roberto Cid — Kachreti CH Round of 32

Kachreti CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR2
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
hard
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Broom C.
6-3 6-4
Cid R.
Broom C.
662
Cid R.
340

Charles Broom defeated Roberto Cid 6-3 6-4 in the Kachreti CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Charles Broom closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Cid R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
49%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
0
Break points saved·Dominant
56
15
Break points won·Dominant
0
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
10
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Cid R.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bertrand R.
Bakshi A.
6-13-67-5
Semi-finals
Bakshi A.
Sekulic P.[1]
7-637-5
Bertrand R.
Jubb P.[5]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Sekulic P.[1]
Ramanathan R.[8]
7-664-67-60
Jubb P.[5]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Bakshi A.
Mott B.
6-16-0
Bertrand R.
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-36-3
R16
Sekulic P.[1]
Strombachs R.
7-667-66
Bertrand R.
Hussey G.[7]
7-56-4
Bakshi A.
Ursu V.[6]
6-26-4
Ramanathan R.[8]
Blanch U.
6-16-4
Mott B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-42-67-65
Gerasimov E.[3]
Soto M.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Glinka D.
Broom C.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Blanch U.
Purtseladze S.
7-647-65
Bertrand R.
Bobrov B.
6-26-0
Broom C.[2]
Cid R.
6-36-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Stewart H.
6-36-4
Karlovskiy E.
Matsuda R.
7-646-4
Strombachs R.
Ayeni O.
6-42-67-5
Ramanathan R.[8]
Oliel Y.
6-37-5
Mott B.
Berankis R.[4]
6-37-5
Bakshi A.
Pawelski M.
6-26-4
Ursu V.[6]
Barroso Campos A.
6-46-3
Hussey G.[7]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-767-646-1
Soto M.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-16-2
Gerasimov E.[3]
Efstathiou M.
6-46-4
Jubb P.[5]
Kimhi O.
6-16-1
Celikbilek A.
Ilkel C.
6-756-46-3
Glinka D.
Erel Y.
6-27-64