Riccardo Bonadio vs Hazem Naw — Augsburg CH Round of 32

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
clay
SYR
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Bonadio R.
6-3 6-0
Naw H.
Bonadio R.
662
Naw H.
300

Riccardo Bonadio defeated Hazem Naw 6-3 6-0 in the Augsburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bonadio R.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Naw H.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bonadio R.Naw H.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bonadio R.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Naw H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Skatov T.[1]
Moller E.[8]
3-67-56-3
Semi-finals
Skatov T.[1]
Masur D.
7-57-5
Moller E.[8]
Bonadio R.
3-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.
Gomez F.
1-66-26-3
Skatov T.[1]
Kodat T.
7-646-4
Masur D.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Moller E.[8]
Taberner C.
6-44-66-4
R16
Moller E.[8]
Gentzsch T.
6-03-0
Bonadio R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-47-65
Masur D.
Gaubas V.
7-656-3
Skatov T.[1]
Gombos N.
6-42-66-1
Kodat T.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-1
Gerch L.
Michalski D.
3-66-36-2
Taberner C.
Vrbensky M.[4]
7-56-4
Gomez F.
Collarini A.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Masur D.
Geerts M.
6-15-76-4
Collarini A.[2]
Alves M.
6-36-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Vallejo A.[5]
6-46-3
Gombos N.
Picchione A.
6-45-76-4
Taberner C.
Echargui M.
6-46-3
Gaubas V.
Furness E.
7-626-3
Skatov T.[1]
Safwat M.
6-46-3
Kodat T.
Otte O.
7-674-66-3
Gerch L.
Giacomini L.
6-47-5
Michalski D.
Holmgren A.[6]
6-26-2
Moller E.[8]
Topo M.
6-47-5
Gentzsch T.
Gill F.
6-17-63
Vrbensky M.[4]
Gavrielides L.
6-16-1
Dedura Palomero D.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-717-56-2
Bonadio R.
Naw H.
6-36-0
Gomez F.
Potenza L.
6-16-0