Sebastian Baez vs Sumit Nagal — Geneva Round of 32

Geneva · ATP · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG5
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 May 2024
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Baez S.
7-6 6-3
Nagal S.
Baez S.
7962
Nagal S.
6730

Sebastian Baez defeated Sumit Nagal 7-6 6-3 in the Geneva round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Nagal S.
1
Serve
—
44
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Even
72%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
1.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 145). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
33
Break points saved·Dominant
96
69
Break points won·Dominant
86
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
16
Tiebreaks·Even
83
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Nagal S.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+180 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Clay Elo 1538
8.3Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
96
96

Baez S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Nagal S.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
18°CPartly cloudy
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 71%
Final
Ruud C.[2]
Machac T.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Machac T.
Djokovic N.[1]
6-40-66-1
Ruud C.[2]
Cobolli F.
1-66-17-64
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Griekspoor T.[6]
7-56-1
Machac T.
Michelsen A.
6-37-62
Ruud C.[2]
Baez S.[5]
6-33-66-4
Cobolli F.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-4
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Shelton B.[4]
4-67-616-2
Shevchenko A.
Ruusuvuori E.
W/O
Griekspoor T.[6]
Shapovalov D.
6-777-646-3
Michelsen A.
Fritz T.[3]
6-44-67-5
Machac T.
Moreno De Alboran N.
4-67-56-0
Baez S.[5]
Carballes Baena R.
6-36-0
Ruud C.[2]
Ofner S.
4-66-26-2
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.
Goffin D.
6-26-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Giron M.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Karatsev A.
7-56-1
Baez S.[5]
Nagal S.
7-676-3
Carballes Baena R.
Altmaier D.
7-626-4
Ofner S.
Hijikata R.
4-66-46-3
Hanfmann Y.
Murray A.
7-56-2
Griekspoor T.[6]
Eubanks C.
6-41-66-3
Michelsen A.
Kovacevic A.
3-66-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Marozsan F.[7]
6-47-64
Shapovalov D.
Coria F.
7-56-0
Machac T.
Draper J.[8]
7-666-1