Clement Tabur vs Sho Shimabukuro — Tunis CH Round of 16

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2024
clay
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN5
Sho Shimabukuro
#95ATP
1672ELO
1510Clay ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
Tabur C.
6-2 7-6
Shimabukuro S.
Tabur C.
6782
Shimabukuro S.
2660

Clement Tabur defeated Sho Shimabukuro 6-2 7-6 in the Tunis CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sho Shimabukuro came in ranked #95, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Clement Tabur closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Shimabukuro S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Shimabukuro S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Shimabukuro S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
88
Break points won·Slight edge
23
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
40
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
45
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Shimabukuro S.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5+44 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1510
4.9Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1672
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Shimabukuro S.
Freshness·Dominant
55
96

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Shimabukuro S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Roca Batalla O.
Royer V.
7-657-5
Semi-finals
Roca Batalla O.
Dzumhur D.[2]
6-37-65
Royer V.
Vacherot V.[1]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Roca Batalla O.
Dellien Velasco M.
4-66-06-4
Dzumhur D.[2]
Tabur C.
7-53-66-2
Vacherot V.[1]
Skatov T.
6-16-2
Royer V.
Olivieri G.[8]
6-16-2
R16
Skatov T.
Brouwer G.
6-26-3
Vacherot V.[1]
Hardt N.
6-16-1
Royer V.
Dougaz A.
6-45-77-5
Olivieri G.[8]
Crawford O.
3-67-56-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Roca Batalla O.
Lamasine T.
6-26-3
Tabur C.
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-27-66
Dzumhur D.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-03-66-4
R32
Olivieri G.[8]
Efstathiou M.
6-02-0
Dzumhur D.[2]
Vrbensky M.
7-56-3
Landaluce M.
Hemery C.
6-33-67-65
Vacherot V.[1]
Basilashvili N.
6-16-4
Skatov T.
Bonzi B.[6]
5-76-36-2
Hardt N.
Weis A.
6-46-2
Brouwer G.
Gill F.
7-56-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[4]
6-35-76-4
Dougaz A.
Janvier M.
7-636-4
Crawford O.
Ouakaa A.
6-26-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Travaglia S.[7]
5-76-36-1
Krueger M.
Misolic F.
7-636-4
Roca Batalla O.
Lajal M.
6-33-67-67
Lamasine T.
Harris B.
7-56-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Campana Lee G.
6-46-4
Tabur C.
Cecchinato M.
7-676-4