Adam Walton vs Ji Sung Nam — Taipei CH Round of 16

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Adam Walton
AUS3
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2024
hard
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Walton A.
6-0 6-3
Nam J.
Walton A.
662
Nam J.
030

Adam Walton defeated Ji Sung Nam 6-0 6-3 in the Taipei CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Nam J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve advantage — Walton A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Nam J.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Nam J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Nam J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
0
Break points saved·Dominant
95
26
Break points won·Even
20
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nam J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Nam J.
Freshness·
54
—

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[3]
Marchenko I.
3-66-27-63
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Hsu Y.
0-67-636-3
Walton A.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-646-2
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Fery A.
7-57-5
Marchenko I.
Purcell M.[1]
6-46-3
Hsu Y.
Hong S.[6]
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Berankis R.
6-37-67
R16
Walton A.[3]
Nam J.
6-06-3
Marchenko I.
Donskoy E.
3-66-36-4
Berankis R.
Escoffier A.[8]
3-66-26-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-47-62
Hong S.[6]
Ellis B.
6-26-2
Purcell M.[1]
Bertola R.
6-34-66-4
Hsu Y.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Donskoy E.
Jasika O.[7]
6-47-68
Purcell M.[1]
Trotter J.
6-736-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Yin B.
6-46-4
Berankis R.
Holt B.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Moriya H.
6-37-64
Bertola R.
Ho R.
6-36-1
Ellis B.
Huang T.
6-26-4
Walton A.[3]
Shimizu Y.
7-656-0
Hsu Y.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-656-3
Noguchi R.
Ayeni O.
7-626-3
Hong S.[6]
Echargui M.
7-676-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Mccabe J.
6-14-67-64
Nam J.
Chung Y.
6-47-60
Tu L.[5]
Sekulic P.
7-56-2
Fery A.
Wu T.
6-17-5
Duckworth J.[2]
Mukund S.
6-36-4