Illya Marchenko vs Max Purcell — Taipei CH Quarter-final

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2024
hard
AUS1
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Marchenko I.
6-4 6-3
Purcell M.
Marchenko I.
662
Purcell M.
430

Illya Marchenko defeated Max Purcell 6-4 6-3 in the Taipei CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
56%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
7.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
80
92
Break points won·Even
7
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marchenko I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Purcell M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[3]
Marchenko I.
3-66-27-63
Semi-finals
Marchenko I.
Hsu Y.
0-67-636-3
Walton A.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
3-67-646-2
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Fery A.
7-57-5
Marchenko I.
Purcell M.[1]
6-46-3
Hsu Y.
Hong S.[6]
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Berankis R.
6-37-67
R16
Walton A.[3]
Nam J.
6-06-3
Marchenko I.
Donskoy E.
3-66-36-4
Berankis R.
Escoffier A.[8]
3-66-26-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-47-62
Hong S.[6]
Ellis B.
6-26-2
Purcell M.[1]
Bertola R.
6-34-66-4
Hsu Y.
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Fery A.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-4
R32
Donskoy E.
Jasika O.[7]
6-47-68
Purcell M.[1]
Trotter J.
6-736-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Yin B.
6-46-4
Berankis R.
Holt B.
6-16-1
Marchenko I.
Moriya H.
6-37-64
Bertola R.
Ho R.
6-36-1
Ellis B.
Huang T.
6-26-4
Walton A.[3]
Shimizu Y.
7-656-0
Hsu Y.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-656-3
Noguchi R.
Ayeni O.
7-626-3
Hong S.[6]
Echargui M.
7-676-2
Escoffier A.[8]
Mccabe J.
6-14-67-64
Nam J.
Chung Y.
6-47-60
Tu L.[5]
Sekulic P.
7-56-2
Fery A.
Wu T.
6-17-5
Duckworth J.[2]
Mukund S.
6-36-4