Jaime Faria vs Roman Andres Burruchaga — Oeiras CH Semi-final

Oeiras CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
POR
Jaime Faria
#92ATP
1735ELO
1706Clay ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2024
clay
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG6
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#67ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
Faria J.
6-4 6-7 6-1
Burruchaga R.
Faria J.
66562
Burruchaga R.
47711

Jaime Faria defeated Roman Andres Burruchaga 6-4 6-7 6-1 in the Oeiras CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in ranked #67.

Key context

  • Match story: Jaime Faria came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Burruchaga R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Burruchaga R.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 190). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Burruchaga R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
68
Break points won·Dominant
22
73
Deciding sets·Even
81
84
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Burruchaga R.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8+12 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
6.2Clay Elo 1694
4.0Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Burruchaga R.
Freshness·Even
91
94

Faria J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Burruchaga R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-43-67-5
Faria J.
Ymer E.
3-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Royer V.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[4]
Faria J.
5-77-646-0
Faria J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-46-756-1
Ymer E.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Faria J.
Gaubas V.
6-47-65
Blanchet U.
Napolitano S.
4-66-16-4
Royer V.
Novak D.
7-671-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
De Loore J.
6-32-0
Yevseyev D.
Zhukayev B.
6-42-66-3
Faria J.
Novak D.
2-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Choinski J.
6-21-66-4
R16
Faria J.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[9]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.
Atmane T.[6]
6-16-0
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[1]
7-54-67-65
Blanchet U.
Nava E.[5]
6-47-63
Novak D.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[4]
Ymer E.
1-66-47-66
Novak D.
Michelsen A.[1]
7-636-4
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.[7]
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Harris L.[5]
7-56-3
Faria J.
Heide G.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-41-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[3]
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Boyer T.
6-47-5
R32
Elias G.
Kasnikowski M.
6-11-1
Ymer E.
Sachko V.
6-40-0
Novak D.
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-37-61
Napolitano S.
Kovalik J.
7-616-2
Fognini F.[1]
De Loore J.
4-66-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Erhard M.
4-66-36-2
De Jong J.[9]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Royer V.
Andreev A.
6-05-76-4
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-33-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
7-57-5
Comesana F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-25-76-3
Atmane T.[6]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-52-66-3
Tseng C.
Halys Q.
4-67-636-2
Faria J.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-23-67-62
Novak D.
Added D.
6-01-0
Zhukayev B.
Onclin G.
7-637-67
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.
4-67-622-0
Choinski J.
Svajda Z.[2]
6-36-0
Ymer E.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Rocha H.
4-66-36-4
Heide G.
Popko D.
6-16-2
Faria J.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Kopriva V.[4]
Ficovich J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Elias G.
6-44-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Kypson P.[7]
Wong C.
6-36-1
Yevseyev D.
Neumayer L.
3-67-56-0
Nava E.[3]
Berrettini J.
6-726-47-5
Harris L.[5]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-66
Boyer T.
Blanch D.
6-787-606-3