Emilio Nava vs Jacopo Berrettini — Oeiras CH Round of 32

Oeiras CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA3
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 May 2024
clay
ITA
Jacopo Berrettini
#546ATP
1325ELO
1336Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Nava E.
6-7 6-4 7-5
Berrettini J.
Nava E.
62672
Berrettini J.
77451

Emilio Nava defeated Jacopo Berrettini 6-7 6-4 7-5 in the Oeiras CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Berrettini J.

Berrettini J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Berrettini J.
22
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Berrettini J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Berrettini J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
2
Break points saved·Dominant
94
23
Break points won·Even
17
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Berrettini J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.1+350 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1336
9.7Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.3Overall Elo 1325
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
1.7
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Berrettini J.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-43-67-5
Faria J.
Ymer E.
3-67-636-4
Semi-finals
Blanchet U.
Royer V.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[4]
Faria J.
5-77-646-0
Faria J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-46-756-1
Ymer E.
Yevseyev D.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Faria J.
Gaubas V.
6-47-65
Blanchet U.
Napolitano S.
4-66-16-4
Royer V.
Novak D.
7-671-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
De Loore J.
6-32-0
Yevseyev D.
Zhukayev B.
6-42-66-3
Faria J.
Novak D.
2-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Choinski J.
6-21-66-4
R16
Faria J.
Tseng C.
6-26-3
Royer V.
De Jong J.[9]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.
Atmane T.[6]
6-16-0
Napolitano S.
Fognini F.[1]
7-54-67-65
Blanchet U.
Nava E.[5]
6-47-63
Novak D.
Agamenone F.
6-36-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Comesana F.[4]
Ymer E.
1-66-47-66
Novak D.
Michelsen A.[1]
7-636-4
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.[7]
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Harris L.[5]
7-56-3
Faria J.
Heide G.
6-46-4
De Loore J.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-41-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[3]
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Boyer T.
6-47-5
R32
Elias G.
Kasnikowski M.
6-11-1
Ymer E.
Sachko V.
6-40-0
Novak D.
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-36-2
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-37-61
Napolitano S.
Kovalik J.
7-616-2
Fognini F.[1]
De Loore J.
4-66-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Erhard M.
4-66-36-2
De Jong J.[9]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Royer V.
Andreev A.
6-05-76-4
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.
6-33-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
7-57-5
Comesana F.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-25-76-3
Atmane T.[6]
Harris B.
2-66-36-4
Gaubas V.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-52-66-3
Tseng C.
Halys Q.
4-67-636-2
Faria J.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-23-67-62
Novak D.
Added D.
6-01-0
Zhukayev B.
Onclin G.
7-637-67
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.
4-67-622-0
Choinski J.
Svajda Z.[2]
6-36-0
Ymer E.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[1]
Rocha H.
4-66-36-4
Heide G.
Popko D.
6-16-2
Faria J.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Kopriva V.[4]
Ficovich J.
6-27-5
De Loore J.
Elias G.
6-44-66-3
Burruchaga R.[6]
Andreev A.
7-666-3
Kypson P.[7]
Wong C.
6-36-1
Yevseyev D.
Neumayer L.
3-67-56-0
Nava E.[3]
Berrettini J.
6-726-47-5
Harris L.[5]
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-66
Boyer T.
Blanch D.
6-787-606-3