Max Hans Rehberg vs Otto Virtanen — Mauthausen CH Round of 16

Mauthausen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Max Hans Rehberg
#409ATP
1474ELO
1398Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
Otto Virtanen
FIN4
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1532Clay ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Rehberg M.
6-7 7-6 7-5
Virtanen O.
Rehberg M.
647772
Virtanen O.
776551

Max Hans Rehberg defeated Otto Virtanen 6-7 7-6 7-5 in the Mauthausen CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rehberg M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Virtanen O.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rehberg M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rehberg M.Virtanen O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
8.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (100 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rehberg M.Virtanen O.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
94
Break points won·Dominant
41
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rehberg M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Virtanen O.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1398
Surface ELO
6.8+134 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1474
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rehberg M.Virtanen O.
Freshness·Slight edge
75
80

Rehberg M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d) · Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pouille L.
Kovalik J.[6]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Pouille L.
Comesana F.[1]
7-653-1
Kovalik J.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
6-7106-36-0
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.[1]
Misolic F.
7-56-4
Pouille L.
Rehberg M.
6-26-3
Kuzmanov D.
Schwaerzler J.
6-26-3
Kovalik J.[6]
Melzer G.
7-666-3
R16
Rehberg M.
Virtanen O.[4]
6-747-657-5
Schwaerzler J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Kovalik J.[6]
Heide G.
6-26-1
Comesana F.[1]
Cerundolo J.
6-16-2
Misolic F.
Blanchet U.[7]
3-66-36-2
Pouille L.
Choinski J.
7-636-3
Kuzmanov D.
Neumayer L.
2-66-26-0
Melzer G.
Burruchaga R.[2]
6-46-4
R32
Choinski J.
Hassan B.[5]
6-22-0
Landaluce M.
Shimabukuro S.[8]
5-76-12-1
Neumayer L.
Diallo G.
4-67-54-2
Heide G.
Gea A.
6-31-66-3
Kovalik J.[6]
Gaubas V.
6-07-60
Cerundolo J.
Kopp S.
6-26-3
Rehberg M.
Sorger S.
6-16-2
Schwaerzler J.
Rosenkranz M.
7-616-4
Comesana F.[1]
De Loore J.
6-36-3
Misolic F.
Huesler M.
6-23-66-4
Blanchet U.[7]
Martineau M.
6-34-66-2
Virtanen O.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Pouille L.
Novak D.
6-33-66-4
Kuzmanov D.
Safwat M.
6-36-2
Melzer G.
Kym J.
6-23-66-3
Burruchaga R.[2]
Ymer E.
3-66-36-4