Hamad Medjedovic vs J J Wolf — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 2

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
J J Wolf
USA10
J J Wolf
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLW
Medjedovic H.
6-1 6-4
Wolf J.
Medjedovic H.
662
Wolf J.
140

Hamad Medjedovic defeated J J Wolf 6-1 6-4 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — J J Wolf came in defending last year's round of 32, but Hamad Medjedovic had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wolf J.

Wolf J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Serve advantage — Medjedovic H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Wolf J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Wolf J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
61
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Slight edge
39
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wolf J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.3
Minutes 14d
9.3
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Wolf J.
Freshness·Even
96
96

Medjedovic H.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Wolf J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 56%
Q2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Kopriva V.
6-43-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Wolf J.[10]
6-16-4
Muller A.[17]
Albot R.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[23]
Moutet C.[4]
6-36-4
Passaro F.
Ajdukovic D.[24]
7-656-767-63
Bergs Z.[11]
Shang J.[18]
6-47-65
Schwartzman D.
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Bagnis F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[9]
Gasquet R.[21]
6-36-4
Barrere G.[16]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-37-67
Atmane T.
Mayot H.[19]
6-32-66-2
Nakashima B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-44-66-4
Q1
Muller A.[17]
Nava E.
4-66-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Gaston H.[7]
6-33-66-1
De Jong J.
Rodionov J.[22]
6-32-66-4
Shang J.[18]
Maestrelli F.
6-13-66-3
Albot R.
Daniel T.[3]
6-40-66-1
Moutet C.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
Marterer M.[9]
Picchione A.
4-66-37-5
Gasquet R.[21]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Ramos A.[13]
6-13-67-5
Wolf J.[10]
Zapata Miralles B.
4-67-656-1
Medjedovic H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[15]
7-616-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Nakashima B.[1]
Fatic N.
7-657-5
Bergs Z.[11]
Kypson P.
4-66-36-4
Mayot H.[19]
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.[23]
Oradini G.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Coria F.[2]
6-35-77-63
Kukushkin M.
Garin C.[5]
5-77-697-62
Ajdukovic D.[24]
Piros Z.
7-623-66-2
Barrere G.[16]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-5
Moreno De Alboran N.
Varillas J.[14]
6-47-5
Atmane T.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
7-57-65
Passaro F.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-57-5
Bagnis F.
Tirante T.[12]
7-687-65