Seong Chan Hong vs Illya Marchenko — Wuxi CH Round of 32

Wuxi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR8
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
hard
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Hong S.
6-3 6-3
Marchenko I.
Hong S.
662
Marchenko I.
330

Seong Chan Hong defeated Illya Marchenko 6-3 6-3 in the Wuxi CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Seong Chan Hong came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Seong Chan Hong extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersQ1hardSeong Chan Hong7-6(5) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Serve advantage — Hong S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
13
Break points saved·Even
77
80
Break points won·Clear edge
30
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marchenko I.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
7.0
Surface form
2.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gerasimov E.
Kachmazov A.
1-66-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Sekulic P.
7-51-66-4
Quarter-finals
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Gerasimov E.
Cui J.
3-66-47-5
Kachmazov A.
Walton A.[3]
6-31-66-2
Sekulic P.
Bertola R.
7-642-67-5
R16
Kachmazov A.
Hong S.[8]
6-12-67-66
Cui J.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-63
Gerasimov E.
Purcell M.[1]
6-46-3
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Xiao L.
6-17-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
6-16-3
Wu T.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Bertola R.
Te R.
7-626-3
Sekulic P.
Holt B.
6-43-66-4
R32
Schoolkate T.
Zhou Y.
7-667-65
Bolt A.
Escoffier A.
7-617-63
Xiao L.
Li H.
6-36-2
Yunchaokete B.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-0
Wu T.
Zhukayev B.[7]
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Bai Y.
6-16-1
Cui J.
Bellucci M.[6]
2-67-656-2
Te R.
Donskoy E.
6-777-647-5
Purcell M.[1]
Sun F.
4-66-16-1
Gerasimov E.
Moriya H.
6-37-5
Walton A.[3]
Mccabe J.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Saville L.
6-46-1
Hong S.[8]
Marchenko I.
6-36-3
Bertola R.
Cressy M.[5]
6-46-4
Holt B.
Fery A.
7-656-4
Sekulic P.
Tu L.[9]
5-76-46-4