Brandon Nakashima vs Nerman Fatic — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 1

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Brandon Nakashima
USA1
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1735Clay ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Nakashima B.
7-6 7-5
Fatic N.
Nakashima B.
7772
Fatic N.
6550

Brandon Nakashima defeated Nerman Fatic 7-6 7-5 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32, defending last year's round of 128.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
24
Break points saved·Dominant
99
63
Break points won·Clear edge
13
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
3.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.8+257 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Clay Elo 1478
8.9Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Fatic N.
Freshness·
88
—

Nakashima B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 56%
Q2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Kopriva V.
6-43-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Wolf J.[10]
6-16-4
Muller A.[17]
Albot R.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[23]
Moutet C.[4]
6-36-4
Passaro F.
Ajdukovic D.[24]
7-656-767-63
Bergs Z.[11]
Shang J.[18]
6-47-65
Schwartzman D.
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Bagnis F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[9]
Gasquet R.[21]
6-36-4
Barrere G.[16]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-37-67
Atmane T.
Mayot H.[19]
6-32-66-2
Nakashima B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-44-66-4
Q1
Muller A.[17]
Nava E.
4-66-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Gaston H.[7]
6-33-66-1
De Jong J.
Rodionov J.[22]
6-32-66-4
Shang J.[18]
Maestrelli F.
6-13-66-3
Albot R.
Daniel T.[3]
6-40-66-1
Moutet C.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
Marterer M.[9]
Picchione A.
4-66-37-5
Gasquet R.[21]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Ramos A.[13]
6-13-67-5
Wolf J.[10]
Zapata Miralles B.
4-67-656-1
Medjedovic H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[15]
7-616-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Nakashima B.[1]
Fatic N.
7-657-5
Bergs Z.[11]
Kypson P.
4-66-36-4
Mayot H.[19]
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.[23]
Oradini G.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Coria F.[2]
6-35-77-63
Kukushkin M.
Garin C.[5]
5-77-697-62
Ajdukovic D.[24]
Piros Z.
7-623-66-2
Barrere G.[16]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-5
Moreno De Alboran N.
Varillas J.[14]
6-47-5
Atmane T.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
7-57-65
Passaro F.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-57-5
Bagnis F.
Tirante T.[12]
7-687-65