Jack Draper vs Borna Coric — Rome Masters Round of 128

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 128
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#131ATP
1822ELO
1697Clay ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
CRO
Borna Coric
#847ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Draper J.
7-5 6-1
Coric B.
Draper J.
762
Coric B.
510

Jack Draper defeated Borna Coric 7-5 6-1 in the Rome Masters round of 128 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #131.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Draper came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Coric B.

Coric B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Coric B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Coric B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
71
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
83
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
84
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
95
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Coric B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Coric B.
Freshness·
100
—

Draper J.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 56%
Final
Zverev A.[3]
Jarry N.[21]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Zverev A.[3]
Tabilo A.[29]
1-67-646-2
Jarry N.[21]
Paul T.[14]
6-36-736-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[14]
Hurkacz H.[7]
7-53-66-3
Jarry N.[21]
Tsitsipas S.[6]
3-67-56-4
Tabilo A.[29]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Zverev A.[3]
Fritz T.[11]
6-46-3
R16
Tabilo A.[29]
Khachanov K.[16]
7-657-610
Hurkacz H.[7]
Baez S.[17]
5-77-646-4
Jarry N.[21]
Muller A.
7-56-3
Zhang Z.
Monteiro T.
7-646-3
Zverev A.[3]
Borges N.
6-27-5
Fritz T.[11]
Dimitrov G.[8]
6-26-7116-1
Tsitsipas S.[6]
De Minaur A.[9]
6-16-2
Paul T.[14]
Medvedev D.[2]
6-16-4
R32
Tabilo A.[29]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-26-3
Monteiro T.
Kecmanovic M.
6-24-67-66
Khachanov K.[16]
Cerundolo F.[20]
6-26-4
Zhang Z.
Shelton B.[12]
6-26-4
Zverev A.[3]
Darderi L.
7-636-2
Fritz T.[11]
Korda S.[24]
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.[8]
Atmane T.
7-636-3
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Norrie C.[27]
6-27-61
De Minaur A.[9]
Auger Aliassime F.[18]
6-726-46-4
Jarry N.[21]
Napolitano S.
6-24-66-4
Muller A.
Rublev A.[4]
3-66-36-2
Hurkacz H.[7]
Etcheverry T.[25]
7-676-2
Baez S.[17]
Rune H.[10]
2-66-26-3
Paul T.[14]
Koepfer D.
6-46-3
Medvedev D.[2]
Medjedovic H.
7-652-67-5
Borges N.
Passaro F.
4-67-687-64
R64
Djokovic N.[1]
Moutet C.
6-36-1
Tabilo A.[29]
Hanfmann Y.
6-37-64
Khachanov K.[16]
Shevchenko A.
6-46-4
Atmane T.
Musetti L.[26]
7-51-0
Dimitrov G.[8]
Nishioka Y.
7-56-4
Norrie C.[27]
Munar J.
6-31-66-3
De Minaur A.[9]
Carballes Baena R.
6-36-2
Jarry N.[21]
Arnaldi M.
6-27-66
Muller A.
Fils A.[31]
7-56-3
Baez S.[17]
Lajovic D.
7-637-66
Hurkacz H.[7]
Nadal R.
6-16-3
Napolitano S.
Shang J.
6-736-16-0
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Struff J.
6-716-46-4
Shelton B.[12]
Kotov P.
4-66-36-4
Monteiro T.
Thompson J.[32]
6-16-3
Kecmanovic M.
Ruud C.[5]
0-66-46-4
Zverev A.[3]
Vukic A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.
Navone M.[28]
6-36-2
Passaro F.
Griekspoor T.[23]
4-66-37-65
Borges N.
Bublik A.[15]
6-46-4
Fritz T.[11]
Fognini F.
6-36-4
Korda S.[24]
Cobolli F.
7-664-66-4
Auger Aliassime F.[18]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-17-66
Rublev A.[4]
Giron M.
5-76-47-5
Etcheverry T.[25]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-37-5
Rune H.[10]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Paul T.[14]
Karatsev A.
6-46-2
Koepfer D.
Tiafoe F.[22]
6-46-2
Medjedovic H.
Davidovich Fokina A.[30]
7-646-4
Medvedev D.[2]
Draper J.
7-56-4
Cerundolo F.[20]
Gigante M.
6-16-3
Zhang Z.
Mannarino A.[19]
6-16-3
R128
Kotov P.
Michelsen A.
6-16-1
Zhang Z.
Galan D.
6-27-5
Cobolli F.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Atmane T.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.
Ofner S.
6-32-67-64
Carballes Baena R.
Oconnell C.
6-775-0
Struff J.
Cachin P.
6-46-4
Borges N.
Martinez P.
6-736-47-68
Medjedovic H.
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Nardi L.
Altmaier D.
6-46-4
Moutet C.
Safiullin R.
3-67-616-2
Hanfmann Y.
Mensik J.
6-36-2
Gigante M.
Zeppieri G.
7-626-4
Shevchenko A.
Marozsan F.
6-36-2
Monteiro T.
Monfils G.
6-27-5
Kecmanovic M.
Nakashima B.
6-46-4
Darderi L.
Shapovalov D.
6-746-37-64
Passaro F.
Rinderknech A.
6-737-57-67
Fognini F.
Evans D.
6-43-66-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-757-64
Napolitano S.
Wolf J.
6-27-63
Arnaldi M.
Mayot H.
3-67-56-4
Muller A.
Fucsovics M.
4-67-656-2
Giron M.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-36-3
Nadal R.
Bergs Z.
4-66-36-4
Lajovic D.
Sonego L.
6-36-756-3
Karatsev A.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-4
Koepfer D.
Vavassori A.
6-46-3
Draper J.
Coric B.
7-56-1
Munar J.
Hijikata R.
6-47-5
Seyboth Wild T.
Barrere G.
6-46-2
Vukic A.
Schwartzman D.
6-26-2