Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Facundo Bagnis — Rome Masters Qualifying Round 2

Rome Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED20
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2024
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 6-1
Bagnis F.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Bagnis F.
310

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-3 6-1 in the Rome Masters qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Botic Van De Zandschulp extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-30US OpenR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-0 6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Bagnis F.
26
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Dominant
68
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.6+107 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1584
7.2Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1591
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Bagnis F.
Freshness·
95
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 56%
Q2
Moreno De Alboran N.
Kopriva V.
6-43-66-3
Medjedovic H.
Wolf J.[10]
6-16-4
Muller A.[17]
Albot R.
7-56-2
Monteiro T.[23]
Moutet C.[4]
6-36-4
Passaro F.
Ajdukovic D.[24]
7-656-767-63
Bergs Z.[11]
Shang J.[18]
6-47-65
Schwartzman D.
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Bagnis F.
6-36-1
Marterer M.[9]
Gasquet R.[21]
6-36-4
Barrere G.[16]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-37-67
Atmane T.
Mayot H.[19]
6-32-66-2
Nakashima B.[1]
De Jong J.
6-44-66-4
Q1
Muller A.[17]
Nava E.
4-66-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Gaston H.[7]
6-33-66-1
De Jong J.
Rodionov J.[22]
6-32-66-4
Shang J.[18]
Maestrelli F.
6-13-66-3
Albot R.
Daniel T.[3]
6-40-66-1
Moutet C.[4]
Dzumhur D.
6-16-3
Marterer M.[9]
Picchione A.
4-66-37-5
Gasquet R.[21]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Ramos A.[13]
6-13-67-5
Wolf J.[10]
Zapata Miralles B.
4-67-656-1
Medjedovic H.
Ugo Carabelli C.[15]
7-616-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[20]
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Nakashima B.[1]
Fatic N.
7-657-5
Bergs Z.[11]
Kypson P.
4-66-36-4
Mayot H.[19]
Vacherot V.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.[23]
Oradini G.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.
Coria F.[2]
6-35-77-63
Kukushkin M.
Garin C.[5]
5-77-697-62
Ajdukovic D.[24]
Piros Z.
7-623-66-2
Barrere G.[16]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-5
Moreno De Alboran N.
Varillas J.[14]
6-47-5
Atmane T.
Kokkinakis T.[6]
7-57-65
Passaro F.
Kovacevic A.[8]
7-57-5
Bagnis F.
Tirante T.[12]
7-687-65