Adam Walton vs Beibit Zhukayev — Guangzhou CH Quarter-final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Adam Walton
AUS3
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2024
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Walton A.
6-3 5-7 7-5
Zhukayev B.
Walton A.
6572
Zhukayev B.
3751

Adam Walton defeated Beibit Zhukayev 6-3 5-7 7-5 in the Guangzhou CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

  • Match story: Adam Walton closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Zhukayev B.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
11.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
31
Break points saved·Even
95
94
Break points won·Clear edge
20
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
25
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Zhukayev B.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+267 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1402
7.7Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1455
7.2No prior meetings
H2H
2.8
8.0
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Zhukayev B.
Freshness·
54
—

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4