Arthur Rinderknech vs Botic Van De ZandschulpAix En Provence CH Round of 32

Aix En Provence CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
#28ATP
1780ELO
1713Clay ELO
$855kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2024
clay
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLL
Rinderknech A.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Rinderknech A.
66762
Van De Zandschulp B.
47931

Arthur Rinderknech defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Aix En Provence CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Arthur Rinderknech came in ranked #28. Arthur Rinderknech claimed a first win over Botic Van De Zandschulp in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

02
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-23BaselQ2hardBotic Van De Zandschulp7-6(4) 6-3
2021-02-22MontpellierQ1hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Rinderknech A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rinderknech A.

Serve advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rinderknech A.Van De Zandschulp B.
67
Serve
26
29
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
6
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+22 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1690
5.6Overall Elo 1780
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
5.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Even
91
95

Rinderknech A.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast