Facundo Bagnis vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Aix En Provence CH Round of 32

Aix En Provence CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2024
clay
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1558Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Bagnis F.
6-7 6-4 6-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bagnis F.
69662
Ruusuvuori E.
711421

Facundo Bagnis defeated Emil Ruusuvuori 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the Aix En Provence CH round of 32 on clay. Facundo Bagnis claimed a first win over Emil Ruusuvuori in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-04Davis Cup QLS R1: ARG vs FINRRhardEmil Ruusuvuori7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 57). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Clear edge
35
48
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ruusuvuori E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+26 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Clay Elo 1558
4.8Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1606
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.[3]
Munar J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Munar J.
Safiullin R.[4]
7-646-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Vacherot V.
3-66-16-3
Quarter-finals
Tabilo A.[3]
Bagnis F.
6-00-0
Vacherot V.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.[4]
Nakashima B.
6-37-65
Munar J.
Etcheverry T.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Munar J.
Muller A.
7-54-66-2
Vacherot V.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-33-67-64
Tabilo A.[3]
Gaston H.
4-66-17-5
Nakashima B.
Comesana F.
7-57-67
Gasquet R.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-2
Bagnis F.
Shevchenko A.[7]
6-31-66-3
Safiullin R.[4]
Ramos A.
6-36-2
Etcheverry T.[2]
Rinderknech A.
7-637-5
R32
Ramos A.
Wawrinka S.
6-36-736-4
Rinderknech A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-46-776-3
Gasquet R.
Mayot H.
6-33-66-4
Vacherot V.
Kovacevic A.
7-57-65
Shevchenko A.[7]
Barrere G.
6-36-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Vukic A.[8]
6-26-3
Gaston H.
Atmane T.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-796-46-2
Nakashima B.
Martinez P.[6]
3-66-46-4
Comesana F.
Kukushkin M.
6-41-67-66
Munar J.
Giron M.[5]
6-16-3
Muller A.
Garin C.
6-46-2