Facundo Mena vs Leonardo Aboian — Porto Alegre CH Round of 32

Porto Alegre CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2024
clay
ARG
Leonardo Aboian
#1253ATP
28 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWL
Mena F.
3-6 6-1 6-1
Aboian L.
Mena F.
3662
Aboian L.
6111

Facundo Mena defeated Leonardo Aboian 3-6 6-1 6-1 in the Porto Alegre CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Aboian L.

Aboian L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Serve advantage — Mena F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Aboian L.
1st serve in·Even
56%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Aboian L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Aboian L.
Freshness·
70
—

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kirkin E.[8]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Kirkin E.[8]
Bueno G.
7-653-66-3
Dutra Da Silva D.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Kirkin E.[8]
Torres J.
6-36-737-5
Dutra Da Silva D.
Justo G.
2-66-36-2
Mena F.
Sell K.
6-776-46-1
Bueno G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-36-1
R16
Prado Angelo J.
Alves M.
5-1
Sell K.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-0
Mena F.
Uchida K.
7-56-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Villanueva G.
6-16-3
Justo G.
Cid R.
6-26-4
Bueno G.
Zanellato N.
6-12-66-4
Kirkin E.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
3-66-46-2
Torres J.
Ambrogi L.
7-56-0
R32
Uchida K.
Reis Da Silva J.[5]
6-34-61-0
Prado Angelo J.
Popko D.[3]
7-657-68
Kuzuhara B.
Gimenez I.
7-657-5
Ambrogi L.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
7-637-5
Alves M.
De Almeida G.
7-616-0
Sell K.
Hemery C.[1]
6-26-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Aboian V.
3-66-46-4
Mena F.
Aboian L.
3-66-16-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Oliveira G.[4]
7-54-67-5
Justo G.
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-3
Cid R.
Habib H.[6]
7-56-1
Bueno G.
Guillen Meza A.[7]
7-653-66-1
Zanellato N.
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-767-65
Kirkin E.[8]
Vallejo A.
6-17-63
Torres J.
Clezar G.
6-26-0