Carlos Taberner vs Alexander Weis — Rome CH Qualifying Round 2

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Carlos Taberner
ESP7
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2024
clay
ITA2
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Taberner C.
6-4 6-4
Weis A.
Taberner C.
662
Weis A.
440

Carlos Taberner defeated Alexander Weis 6-4 6-4 in the Rome CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Weis A.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Weis A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Weis A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
50
Break points won·Dominant
59
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Weis A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Buse I.
Barroso Campos A.[12]
6-16-0
Oradini G.[10]
Geerts M.[4]
6-36-4
Serafini M.
Giunta M.
7-676-1
Taberner C.[7]
Weis A.[2]
6-46-4
Nijboer R.
Debru G.[5]
6-36-2
Gaubas V.
Merida Aguilar D.[9]
7-56-4
Q1
Geerts M.[4]
Rottoli L.
6-36-3
Debru G.[5]
Damas M.
7-646-2
Giunta M.
Gerch L.[11]
6-46-4
Weis A.[2]
Purtseladze S.
7-57-5
Serafini M.
Barranco Cosano J.[1]
3-66-35-1
Taberner C.[7]
Weber A.
6-16-1
Buse I.
Bonadio R.[3]
6-44-66-3
Oradini G.[10]
Camilli G.
6-26-1
Nijboer R.
Copil M.[8]
7-56-2
Gaubas V.
Compagnucci T.
6-16-2
Merida Aguilar D.[9]
Krutykh O.
6-46-776-2